I Love For
Extracts from better
from
9.1 received
2
then. Itong Kong Office, and
"the Manager of the Tackor Dockyard
2.
China Asson!!
13.1
Stake that
our
letter of
the. 24? Dec
a
تھا
dealt with
their
Letter
the one
A
different Ordre
referred to in
under reply.
"
A misunderstanding has arisen through the
Foreign Office raising objection to the Foreshore and
Sea Bed (Amendment) Ordinance, No. 26 of 1932. This
they were moved to do after considering a letter from
the China Association (enclosure in (3) on 92583/32)
in which the original mistake regarding the title of
the Ordinance was made.
It is now clear that the objections raised
by theForeign Office as to possible repercussions in
China do not apply to Ordinance No. 26of 1932 but to
the draft Bill of the Foreshore and Sea Bed Works
Ordinance the provisions of which were approved in
(7) on 82746/31/31 and a copy of which, as amended
in accordance with the suggestions contained in that
despatch, was published for information in the
supplement to the Hong Kong Gazette on August 19th
last (filo copy herewith. No spares available).
The Foreign Office were not consulted
when the draft bill was under consideration here as
the possibility of repercussions in China had not
then
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.